<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Do Column Placement in FRx</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frxbuzz.com/how-to-do-column-placement-in-frx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frxbuzz.com/how-to-do-column-placement-in-frx/</link>
	<description>The FRx Tips, Tricks and News Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Harrigan CPA</title>
		<link>http://www.frxbuzz.com/how-to-do-column-placement-in-frx/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Harrigan CPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frxbuzz.com/?p=613#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Excellent point, thanks Jeff! You&#039;re exactly right (of course!): the calculation priority is only necessary in reports where a CAL in the row intersects with a CALC in the column.

FRx has to know which calculation should prevail, and defaults to the CALC in the column (meaning calculation priority is set to &#039;calculate rows first&#039;). 

Makes sense that if D=C1360 was the only calculation in this example, you wouldn&#039;t have to change the default priority. Thanks for pointing that out...Jan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point, thanks Jeff! You&#8217;re exactly right (of course!): the calculation priority is only necessary in reports where a CAL in the row intersects with a CALC in the column.</p>
<p>FRx has to know which calculation should prevail, and defaults to the CALC in the column (meaning calculation priority is set to &#8216;calculate rows first&#8217;). </p>
<p>Makes sense that if D=C1360 was the only calculation in this example, you wouldn&#8217;t have to change the default priority. Thanks for pointing that out&#8230;Jan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff [MSFT]</title>
		<link>http://www.frxbuzz.com/how-to-do-column-placement-in-frx/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff [MSFT]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 06:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frxbuzz.com/?p=613#comment-630</guid>
		<description>Hi Jan,

Good post.  I just wanted to clarify one thing ...

You only need to change the calculation priority to columns first if there&#039;s an intersection of row and column calculations.  In the example above, if you were setting column D=C1360, you would not need to change the calculation priority because there&#039;s only one calculation.  However, because you&#039;re setting column E&#039;s value and column E is a CALC column, FRx needs to know which of the conflicting calculations should take priority (i.e., which should happen first).  It&#039;s a little strange, but that&#039;s the way it works.

Hope that helps.
Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jan,</p>
<p>Good post.  I just wanted to clarify one thing &#8230;</p>
<p>You only need to change the calculation priority to columns first if there&#8217;s an intersection of row and column calculations.  In the example above, if you were setting column D=C1360, you would not need to change the calculation priority because there&#8217;s only one calculation.  However, because you&#8217;re setting column E&#8217;s value and column E is a CALC column, FRx needs to know which of the conflicting calculations should take priority (i.e., which should happen first).  It&#8217;s a little strange, but that&#8217;s the way it works.</p>
<p>Hope that helps.<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Column Placement in FRx - DynamicAccounting.net</title>
		<link>http://www.frxbuzz.com/how-to-do-column-placement-in-frx/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Column Placement in FRx - DynamicAccounting.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frxbuzz.com/?p=613#comment-599</guid>
		<description>[...] Placement in FRx   Jan Harrigan over at FRx Buzz has a nice new post up on Column Placement in FRx. Keep it Jan! We need more FRx stuff!    Published: Tuesday, April 21, 2009, 05:04 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Placement in FRx   Jan Harrigan over at FRx Buzz has a nice new post up on Column Placement in FRx. Keep it Jan! We need more FRx stuff!    Published: Tuesday, April 21, 2009, 05:04 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
